What's
New
December
2, 2008, Oshawa, Ontario -
Paul McKeever, a lawyer and the leader of the
Freedom Party of Canada, today wrote to Canada's
Governor General to point out that the Policy
Accord signed by the leaders of the Liberal,
NDP, and BQ parties would make a Liberal-NDP
coalition government unconstitutional. He respectfully
requested that Governor General dissolve Parliament,
and facilitate a general election, if called
upon by the Prime Minister to do so. The full
text of his letter is reproduced below.
-
- - -
December
2, 2008
Her Excellency the Right Honourable Michaëlle Jean C.C., C.M.M., C.O.M.,
C.D.
Governor General of Canada
Rideau Hall
1 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A1
Excellency:
It
is public knowledge that, in anticipation that
the Official Opposition’s December 8, 2008
motion of no confidence will be successful, Mr.
Stéfane Dion, Mr. Jack Layton, and Mr.
Gilles Duceppe – the leaders of the Liberal,
NDP, and Bloc Quebecois (“BQ”) parties,
respectively - did, on December 1, 2008 sign
a pact with one another titled “A Policy
Accord to Address the Present Economic Crisis” (the “Policy
Accord”). It is widely acknowledged that
the purpose of the Policy Accord is to impress
upon you that a Liberal-NDP coalition would have
the confidence of the House of Commons, such
that it could form a viable government.
As
a citizen, as a lawyer in Ontario, and as leader
of the Freedom Party of Canada, I am writing
to draw your attention to the grave impact that
the Policy Accord has upon your exercise of the
authority to call upon Mr. Dion to form a Liberal-NDP
government. Specifically, were you to call upon
Mr. Dion to form a Liberal-NDP coalition government,
the terms of the Policy Accord would result in
unconstitutional government. My reasons follow.
At
present, the House of Commons has 77 Members
of Parliament (MPs) who are members of the Liberal
Party, 37 who are members of the NDP, 49 who
are members of the BQ, and one Independent. Therefore,
a Liberal-NDP coalition would lack the confidence
of the House if it did not maintain the confidence
of the 49 members of the BQ.
Under
the terms of the Policy Accord, Mr. Gilles Duceppe,
the Leader of the BQ, agrees to be bound by the
following:
“The
Bloc Quebecois will neither move nor will it
support any motions of non-confidence in the
Government during the term of its support for
this agreement...” (Policy Accord, page
3, paragraph 5)
Our
constitutional system of Responsible Government
is designed to protect the governed from tyrannical
or undemocratic governance by requiring that
Canada’s government be replaced – with
or without a general election - should its conduct
lead it to lose the confidence of a majority
of MPs. However, the above-quoted passage from
the Policy Accord binds the hands of BQ MPs and
muzzles them. The Policy Accord, by design,
prevents Bloc MPs from expressing a lack
of confidence in the government until the Policy
Accord expires (not earlier than June 30, 2010).
Thus, if you invite the formation of a coalition
Liberal-NDP government, Responsible Government
will be suspended until at least June 30,
2010.
The
Policy Accord was signed to encourage you to
believe that a Liberal-NDP government will have
the confidence of the House. However, in reality,
the Policy Accord guarantees not well-reasoned confidence in
the government, but unquestioning deference to
its every whim. It removes from every BQ MP the
defensive weapon of a non-confidence vote, and
replaces that weapon with a white flag of surrender.
The signatories to the Policy Accord are, in
reality, saying to you that a Liberal-NDP coalition
would be stable because the constitutional method
of defeating a government would be rendered null
and void for at least 18 months.
Excellency,
the Constitution of Canada is the source of all
governmental authority in this country, including
your own authority. It identifies our country
as both free and democratic. Its intended function
is to ensure that Canada remains free and democratic.
However, were you to call upon Mr. Dion to form
a Liberal-NDP coalition government, the Policy
Accord would undermine the procedural machinery
of our constitution, deprive all Canadians of
the constitution’s protection, and imperil
both freedom and democracy. No degree of reckless,
oppressive, tyrannical, or anti-democratic behavior
on the part of the government could be answered
with a motion of no confidence until at least
June 30, 2010.
Excellency,
for the reasons stated above, I respectfully
request that you exercise your authority to dissolve
Parliament in the event that there is a call
for same by the Prime Minister of Canada.
Sincerely,
Paul
McKeever
Leader, Freedom Party of Canada
c.c.,
Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Mr. Stéfane
Dion, Mr. Jack Layton, Mr. Gilles Duceppe
September
7, 2008, London, Ontario - The Freedom
Party of Canada (Freedom Party) today announced
the launch of its "Free Ballot Campaign" to
oppose the 5 year-old law that gives larger
political parties $1.75 per vote per year.
Although Freedom Party released its 2008
Election Platform in 2004, it will run
no candidates in this election due to objectionable
changes to party registration and finance
laws.
"Under Canada's relatively new political party
welfare system, every ballot cast for Canada's larger
political parties gives them a guaranteed $1.75 per
year", says Freedom Party leader Paul McKeever. "Canadian
taxpayers are even funding the Bloc Quebecois to
the tune of about $3,000,000.00 every year. The BQ
uses that money in an effort to break up the country.
"Our
point is this: ballots should be free. Feeling
compelled to vote for the
lesser of evils,
many Canadians vote for parties they do not like.
In fact, a growing number of Canadians do not vote
at all, yet even their tax money is used to finance
the bigger federal political parties.
"When
political parties are funded voluntarily by voters,
they serve voters.
When they are funded
by the government, they serve the government.
"The
$1.75 per ballot system is anti-freedom, anti-democratic,
and wrong. Now
is the ideal time
for Canadians to oppose it."
Freedom Party will have a number of announcements
concerning the campaign as the 2008 election continues.
BACKGROUNDER
Founded in 2001 as a counterpart to the officially
registered Freedom
Party of Ontario, Freedom Party
of Canada is affiliated with Freedom
Party International (FPI) and shares FPI's philosophy.
Freedom Party released its 2008 election platform
in 2004, expecting 2008 to be the year in which it
would first be ready to run candidates.
Freedom Party submitted its application for registration
in 2004 but its application was voided by a change
in party registration and funding legislation. Freedom
Party decided against registration under the new
system, which it finds both objectionable and disadvantageous
to the development of a party that stands for individual
freedom and democracy.