FP
A Voice for Freedom
Red Maple Leaf
Freedom Party of Canada
A Choice for Canadians
Home
What's New
The Leader
The Team
The Party
Party Policies
Party Constitution
Join the Party
Donations
Contact FP
.. ...

What's New

December 2, 2008, Oshawa, Ontario - Paul McKeever, a lawyer and the leader of the Freedom Party of Canada, today wrote to Canada's Governor General to point out that the Policy Accord signed by the leaders of the Liberal, NDP, and BQ parties would make a Liberal-NDP coalition government unconstitutional. He respectfully requested that Governor General dissolve Parliament, and facilitate a general election, if called upon by the Prime Minister to do so. The full text of his letter is reproduced below.

- - - -

December 2, 2008


Her Excellency the Right Honourable Michaëlle Jean C.C., C.M.M., C.O.M., C.D.
Governor General of Canada
Rideau Hall
1 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A1


Excellency:

It is public knowledge that, in anticipation that the Official Opposition’s December 8, 2008 motion of no confidence will be successful, Mr. Stéfane Dion, Mr. Jack Layton, and Mr. Gilles Duceppe – the leaders of the Liberal, NDP, and Bloc Quebecois (“BQ”) parties, respectively - did, on December 1, 2008 sign a pact with one another titled “A Policy Accord to Address the Present Economic Crisis” (the “Policy Accord”). It is widely acknowledged that the purpose of the Policy Accord is to impress upon you that a Liberal-NDP coalition would have the confidence of the House of Commons, such that it could form a viable government.

As a citizen, as a lawyer in Ontario, and as leader of the Freedom Party of Canada, I am writing to draw your attention to the grave impact that the Policy Accord has upon your exercise of the authority to call upon Mr. Dion to form a Liberal-NDP government. Specifically, were you to call upon Mr. Dion to form a Liberal-NDP coalition government, the terms of the Policy Accord would result in unconstitutional government. My reasons follow.

At present, the House of Commons has 77 Members of Parliament (MPs) who are members of the Liberal Party, 37 who are members of the NDP, 49 who are members of the BQ, and one Independent. Therefore, a Liberal-NDP coalition would lack the confidence of the House if it did not maintain the confidence of the 49 members of the BQ.

Under the terms of the Policy Accord, Mr. Gilles Duceppe, the Leader of the BQ, agrees to be bound by the following:

“The Bloc Quebecois will neither move nor will it support any motions of non-confidence in the Government during the term of its support for this agreement...” (Policy Accord, page 3, paragraph 5)

Our constitutional system of Responsible Government is designed to protect the governed from tyrannical or undemocratic governance by requiring that Canada’s government be replaced – with or without a general election - should its conduct lead it to lose the confidence of a majority of MPs. However, the above-quoted passage from the Policy Accord binds the hands of BQ MPs and muzzles them. The Policy Accord, by design, prevents Bloc MPs from expressing a lack of confidence in the government until the Policy Accord expires (not earlier than June 30, 2010). Thus, if you invite the formation of a coalition Liberal-NDP government, Responsible Government will be suspended until at least June 30, 2010.

The Policy Accord was signed to encourage you to believe that a Liberal-NDP government will have the confidence of the House. However, in reality, the Policy Accord guarantees not well-reasoned confidence in the government, but unquestioning deference to its every whim. It removes from every BQ MP the defensive weapon of a non-confidence vote, and replaces that weapon with a white flag of surrender. The signatories to the Policy Accord are, in reality, saying to you that a Liberal-NDP coalition would be stable because the constitutional method of defeating a government would be rendered null and void for at least 18 months.

Excellency, the Constitution of Canada is the source of all governmental authority in this country, including your own authority. It identifies our country as both free and democratic. Its intended function is to ensure that Canada remains free and democratic. However, were you to call upon Mr. Dion to form a Liberal-NDP coalition government, the Policy Accord would undermine the procedural machinery of our constitution, deprive all Canadians of the constitution’s protection, and imperil both freedom and democracy. No degree of reckless, oppressive, tyrannical, or anti-democratic behavior on the part of the government could be answered with a motion of no confidence until at least June 30, 2010.

Excellency, for the reasons stated above, I respectfully request that you exercise your authority to dissolve Parliament in the event that there is a call for same by the Prime Minister of Canada.


Sincerely,

Paul McKeever
Leader, Freedom Party of Canada

c.c., Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Mr. Stéfane Dion, Mr. Jack Layton, Mr. Gilles Duceppe


September 7, 2008, London, Ontario - The Freedom Party of Canada (Freedom Party) today announced the launch of its "Free Ballot Campaign" to oppose the 5 year-old law that gives larger political parties $1.75 per vote per year. Although Freedom Party released its 2008 Election Platform in 2004, it will run no candidates in this election due to objectionable changes to party registration and finance laws.

"Under Canada's relatively new political party welfare system, every ballot cast for Canada's larger political parties gives them a guaranteed $1.75 per year", says Freedom Party leader Paul McKeever. "Canadian taxpayers are even funding the Bloc Quebecois to the tune of about $3,000,000.00 every year. The BQ uses that money in an effort to break up the country.

"Our point is this: ballots should be free. Feeling compelled to vote for the lesser of evils, many Canadians vote for parties they do not like. In fact, a growing number of Canadians do not vote at all, yet even their tax money is used to finance the bigger federal political parties.

"When political parties are funded voluntarily by voters, they serve voters. When they are funded by the government, they serve the government.

"The $1.75 per ballot system is anti-freedom, anti-democratic, and wrong. Now is the ideal time for Canadians to oppose it."

Freedom Party will have a number of announcements concerning the campaign as the 2008 election continues.

BACKGROUNDER

Founded in 2001 as a counterpart to the officially registered Freedom Party of Ontario, Freedom Party of Canada is affiliated with Freedom Party International (FPI) and shares FPI's philosophy.

Freedom Party released its 2008 election platform in 2004, expecting 2008 to be the year in which it would first be ready to run candidates.

Freedom Party submitted its application for registration in 2004 but its application was voided by a change in party registration and funding legislation. Freedom Party decided against registration under the new system, which it finds both objectionable and disadvantageous to the development of a party that stands for individual freedom and democracy.